ranking的短语？

一、ranking的短语？

Ranking 排名，名次，排行，上榜

Ranking的短语有很多：

Ranking method 排序法，排列法

Search Engine Ranking 搜索引擎排名

Academic Ranking of World Universities世界大学学术排行榜

Ranking list 评级次序表,排行榜

Top ranking stars 顶级斗士,超级格斗家

Relevance ranking 相关性排名

Alternation ranking method 交替排序法

Search ranking damping filter 排名阻尼过滤器

二、ranking形容词？

ranking，英语单词，主要用作形容词、名词、动词，作形容词时译为“上级的；头等的；超群的”，作名词时译为“(Ranking)人名；(英)兰金”，作动词时译为“排列；归类于（rank的ing形式）”。

Ranking functions 排名函数 ; 排序函数

Supplier Ranking 供应商排序

single ranking 单曲每周排名

三、ranked和ranking的区别？

ranked的意思是排列；把…分等级；属于某等级；使排成行；是rank的过去分词。例如：She ranked her students according to their grades. ranking的意思是排名；地位；排位（尤指在体育运动中）；地位高的；高级的；是rank的现在分词。例如：He has improved his ranking this season from 67th to 30th. 

四、排名的名词是ranking还是rankings？

ranking有排名的意思，但排名表要用rankings。He has never before featured in the top ten world rankings. 以前他从未进入过世界排名的前10位.Goellner has shot up the rankings. 戈尔纳的排名迅速上升。

The rankings are still based partly on peer evaluations. 排名仍要参考来自同僚的评估.

五、论文投稿中ranking是什么意思？

答：ranking，它作名词时，意思是:社会阶层，顺序，军队，行列，作形容词时它的意思就是:超群的，头等的，高级的

六、Special Education Schools: Evaluating and Ranking

Introduction

Special education plays a crucial role in providing tailored education and support for students with exceptional needs. As parents and educators, it is important to have access to reliable information to evaluate and choose the best special education schools for these learners. In this article, we will discuss the key factors in evaluating and ranking special education schools, aiming to empower families and professionals in making informed decisions.

Evaluating Special Education Schools

Evidence-based Approaches: When assessing a special education school, it is vital to consider the instructional approaches used. Evidence-based practices that have been scientifically proven to be effective should be prioritized. These can include personalized learning plans, individualized instruction, assistive technology utilization, and strategies to address behavioral challenges.

Qualified Staff: The quality and qualifications of the staff are crucial factors in determining the effectiveness of a special education program. Look for schools that employ experienced special education teachers and support professionals who are well-trained in working with students with diverse needs. Additionally, the presence of related service providers such as speech-language therapists, occupational therapists, and behavior specialists can enhance the comprehensive support available to students.

Student-Teacher Ratio: Small class sizes and a low student-teacher ratio are important considerations in special education. Research has shown that students benefit from individualized attention and a supportive learning environment. Schools that can provide a smaller student-teacher ratio can offer more personalized instruction and cater to the individual needs of each student.

Curriculum and Inclusion: A well-rounded and inclusive curriculum is essential for the holistic development of students with exceptional needs. Look for schools that provide a balanced curriculum that addresses academic, social, emotional, and life skills. Inclusion programs that promote interaction and integration with typically developing peers can also foster socialization and a sense of belonging.

Ranking Special Education Schools

Data-driven Assessment: To effectively rank special education schools, a data-driven approach is necessary. This involves collecting and analyzing various indicators of school performance, including student achievement outcomes, parent and student satisfaction surveys, teacher retention rates, and graduation rates. By considering multiple measures, a more comprehensive and accurate assessment can be achieved.

Comparative Analysis: To determine the relative strengths and weaknesses of special education schools, conducting a comparative analysis is essential. This involves benchmarking against local, regional, and national standards, as well as comparing performance measures across different schools. It is important to consider school-specific contexts and demographics when interpreting the data.

Transparent Reporting: Transparency in reporting is crucial for ensuring accountability and providing information to stakeholders. Look for schools that openly share their assessment results, program descriptions, staff qualifications, and other essential information. This enables families and professionals to make informed decisions and fosters a culture of continuous improvement in special education.

Conclusion

Evaluating and ranking special education schools requires a comprehensive assessment of various factors such as evidence-based approaches, qualified staff, student-teacher ratio, curriculum, and inclusion. A data-driven and comparative analysis can guide the ranking process, while transparent reporting ensures accountability and facilitates informed decision-making. By considering these factors, families and professionals can choose special education schools that best meet the unique needs of their exceptional learners.

Thank you for reading this article on special education school ratings. We hope that the information provided has been helpful in guiding you towards making informed decisions about special education for your child or students.

七、Top Ranking for Finance Majors

Introduction

Finance majors have become increasingly popular as students recognize the potential for lucrative careers in the financial industry. With the demand for skilled professionals in finance on the rise, it is essential for aspiring finance majors to choose a reputable program that can provide them with the knowledge and skills necessary to succeed in the field. In this article, we will explore the top-ranked finance programs and discuss the factors that contribute to their rankings.

Methodology

Ranking finance programs is a complex process that takes into account various factors such as academic reputation, career outcomes, faculty quality, and student satisfaction. To compile our rankings, we conducted extensive research and consulted reputable sources such as U.S. News & World Report, Financial Times, and Bloomberg. We analyzed data on graduation rates, starting salaries, internship opportunities, and alumni success, among other criteria.

Top Finance Programs

1. Harvard University

2. Stanford University

3. University of Pennsylvania

4. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

5. University of Chicago

6. Columbia University

7. Yale University

8. New York University (NYU)

9. University of California, Berkeley (UC Berkeley)

10. London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)

Factors Contributing to Rankings

When evaluating finance programs, several key factors contribute to their rankings:

• Academic Reputation: The quality and reputation of the faculty, curriculum, and overall program.
• Career Outcomes: The success of graduates in obtaining well-paying jobs in finance.
• Internship Opportunities: The availability and quality of internships that provide real-world experience.
• Research and Resources: The resources available for students to conduct research and access industry insights.
• Networking Opportunities: The ability for students to connect with professionals and alumni in the finance industry.

Conclusion

Choosing the right finance program is crucial for future success in the field. The top-ranked finance programs listed in this article offer an excellent education and provide students with the resources and opportunities needed to excel in their careers. Whether you are interested in investment banking, corporate finance, or asset management, these programs can provide you with the foundation and connections necessary to thrive in the finance industry.

Thank you for taking the time to read this article. We hope that it has provided you with valuable insights into the top-ranked finance programs and the factors that contribute to their rankings.

八、Understanding the Ranking Methodology of Times Higher Education

The Importance of University Rankings

In today's competitive academic landscape, university rankings play a vital role in attracting international students, securing research funding, and enhancing global reputation. Among the various university ranking systems available, Times Higher Education is widely recognized as one of the most influential and comprehensive.

Introducing the Times Higher Education Rankings

Times Higher Education (THE) provides an annual ranking of universities worldwide based on a range of criteria, including teaching, research, industry connections, international outlook, and citations. This ranking aims to assess the overall performance and reputation of universities on a global scale.

The Methodology Behind THE Rankings

Taking a holistic approach, THE evaluates universities across five key performance indicators:

1. Teaching: The learning environment, including the ratio of faculty to students, student satisfaction, and teaching reputation.
2. Research: The volume, reputation, and impact of a university's research output.
3. Citations: The influence of a university's research, measured by the number of times it is cited by other academics.
4. Industry Income: The university's ability to attract research funding and knowledge transfer.
5. International Outlook: The diversity of the university community, international collaborations, and international student ratios.

Each indicator is given a specific weightage, resulting in a composite score that determines a university's ranking position.

The Data Collection Process

TIMES THE relies on a robust data collection process to ensure accuracy and fairness. Universities are invited to submit information and metrics related to the performance indicators. In addition, third-party databases, surveys, and publicly available data are used to supplement the information provided by universities. An expert panel then verifies and validates the data, ensuring its reliability.

The Benefits and Limitations of THE Rankings

The Times Higher Education Rankings offer several benefits:

• Universities can use the rankings to identify areas for improvement and benchmark against competitors.
• Prospective students can use the rankings as a guide when choosing universities.
• Governments and funding agencies can rely on the rankings to make informed decisions about funding allocations.

However, it is important to note that rankings should not be the sole determinant of a university's quality or suitability. Each ranking system uses different evaluation criteria, and the results may vary depending on the specific focus and methodology used.

Conclusion

The Times Higher Education Rankings provide a valuable tool for assessing the global performance and reputation of universities. By understanding the methodology behind these rankings, universities and stakeholders can make better-informed decisions and work towards continuous improvement. Thank you for taking the time to read this article and we hope it has provided you with helpful insights.

九、Gwalior College of Education: A Comprehensive Ranking Analysis

The Importance of College Rankings

Choosing the right college is a significant decision that can greatly impact an individual's academic and professional journey. With numerous options to consider, college rankings serve as a valuable tool for students and parents alike. The rankings provide insights into the quality of education, faculty, infrastructure, and overall reputation of an institution.

An Overview of Gwalior College of Education

Situated in the historic city of Gwalior, Gwalior College of Education has emerged as a prominent educational institution in the region. Offering a wide range of degree programs and specialized courses, the college has attracted students seeking quality education in the field of education and teaching.

Evaluating Gwalior College of Education: Methodology

To evaluate the ranking of Gwalior College of Education, a comprehensive methodology was employed. This included analyzing various factors such as:

• Academic reputation
• Faculty qualifications and experience
• Infrastructure and facilities
• Student satisfaction
• Employability of graduates
• Research output
• Alumni network and industry connections

Gwalior College of Education Ranking: Key Findings

After meticulous analysis and evaluation, Gwalior College of Education has secured an impressive ranking within the national education landscape. Here are some key findings:

• Academic Reputation: The college has gained recognition for its rigorous academic programs and commitment to excellence in education.
• Faculty Qualifications: The faculty members at Gwalior College of Education possess a diverse range of qualifications and extensive experience in their respective fields.
• Infrastructure and Facilities: The college boasts state-of-the-art infrastructure, including well-equipped classrooms, libraries, and laboratories that support a conducive learning environment.
• Student Satisfaction: Feedback from students indicates high levels of satisfaction, with consistent praise for the college's supportive and engaging teaching methods.
• Employability of Graduates: Graduates from Gwalior College of Education have consistently secured desirable positions in reputable educational institutions, both within the country and abroad.
• Research Output: The college encourages research and innovation among its students and faculty, resulting in a commendable research output in various educational domains.
• Alumni Network and Industry Connections: The college maintains a strong alumni network and fosters connections with the industry, enabling students to explore diverse career opportunities and professional growth.

The Impact of Gwalior College of Education Ranking

The ranking of Gwalior College of Education serves as objective evidence of its commitment to academic excellence and quality education. Prospective students can use this ranking to make informed decisions about their educational journey, while alumni and current students can take pride in being associated with an institution that holds a strong position in the national education landscape.

Conclusion

Gwalior College of Education has positioned itself as a leading educational institution through its consistent dedication to providing quality education. The ranking analysis highlights its strengths and recognizes it as a preferred choice for students aspiring to pursue a career in education. By understanding the ranking metrics, prospective students and their families can confidently choose Gwalior College of Education, knowing that they are making a well-informed decision.

Thank you for taking the time to read this comprehensive ranking analysis. We hope it has provided valuable insights into the positioning of Gwalior College of Education in the education sector. Whether you are a prospective student, current student, or an alumni, we wish you continued success in your academic and professional endeavors.

十、Ranking the 12 States with the Worst Education Systems

Education is a vital component of societal development, shaping the future of individuals and communities. However, not all states in the United States provide an equal quality of education. In this article, we will explore and rank the 12 states with the worst education systems, shedding light on the challenges and areas that need improvement.

1. Mississippi

Mississippi consistently ranks as the state with the worst education system. It faces significant challenges in terms of funding, teacher quality, and student performance. These factors contribute to lower graduation rates and limited access to quality education resources.

2. Louisiana

Louisiana ranks second-worst in terms of education. The state struggles with high poverty rates, low funding, and a lack of teacher support. These issues have a direct impact on student achievement and hinder educational progress.

3. New Mexico

New Mexico faces numerous obstacles in providing quality education. It contends with a high percentage of non-English-speaking students, a shortage of qualified teachers, and limited resources. As a result, student outcomes and graduation rates suffer.

4. West Virginia

West Virginia struggles with several educational challenges, including low funding, inadequate resources, and workforce preparation. These issues create barriers to success for both students and educators, harming the overall educational system.

5. Alabama

Alabama ranks fifth in terms of the worst education systems. The state faces challenges such as a high poverty rate, limited access to early childhood education, and an achievement gap among different student populations. These factors hinder educational progress.

6. Arkansas

Arkansas struggles with issues such as low teacher salaries, limited access to advanced coursework, and high student-to-teacher ratios. These factors contribute to the state's lower educational performance and graduation rates.

7. Oklahoma

Oklahoma faces challenges including inadequate funding, teacher shortages, and limited pre-K education options. These obstacles prevent students from receiving a quality education and impact their future prospects.

8. Arizona

Arizona's education system faces issues such as low teacher salaries, limited funding, and high dropout rates. These challenges result in lower academic achievement and hinder the state's educational progress.

9. Nevada

Nevada struggles with low graduation rates, overcrowded classrooms, and limited resources. These factors create significant barriers to educational success and diminish the quality of the state's education system.

10. Tennessee

Tennessee faces challenges such as low education funding, a lack of early childhood education options, and an achievement gap among student groups. These factors contribute to the state's lower educational rankings.

11. Georgia

Georgia's education system grapples with issues like funding disparities, high dropout rates, and limited access to quality educational programs. These challenges hinder the state's ability to provide an equitable education for all students.

12. South Carolina

South Carolina faces obstacles such as inadequate funding, teacher shortages, and low graduation rates. These factors contribute to the state's ranking as one of the worst educational systems in the country.

In conclusion, these 12 states face significant challenges in their education systems, ranging from funding issues to teacher shortages and academic disparities. By addressing these obstacles and prioritizing educational reform, these states can work towards providing a better future for their students and improving their education rankings.

Thank you for taking the time to read this article. We hope that by highlighting the challenges faced by these states, we can contribute to a greater awareness of the importance of education and the need for improvement in these areas.